How To Subscribe To The BadIntersections.com Database

Are you tired of navigating through dangerous intersections without knowing their history? Subscribe to the Bad Intersections database today and gain access to crucial information that could save lives. For just $1 per month or a mere 3 cents per day, you'll have peace of mind knowing you're equipped with the most comprehensive intersection safety data available.

How to Subscribe to BadIntersections.com

Subscribing to BadIntersections.com is quick and easy:

  1. Visit BadIntersections.com.
  2. Sign in with your Google account to start accessing the Traffic Safety Database immediately.
  3. Subscribe and begin your journey towards a safer commute today.

How Much Does A Monthly Subscription Cost?

  • .03 Cents Per Day
  • $1 Per Month For Access to the Map Database 
  • Try it out for 7 days risk-free. Cancel at any time using your Google Subscriptions Account

💥 All-Access Map Bundle: 22 Maps for $9.95/month (FREE 7-DAY TRIAL)

Syndicated Maps bundled subscriptions

Syndicated Maps has recently launched a value-packed bundled subscription that gives users access to all 22 of its niche maps for just $9.95 per month—a savings of over 50% compared to subscribing individually. This all-access plan was created in response to user demand for a more affordable way to explore multiple data layers across traffic enforcement, environmental hazards, wireless coverage, energy infrastructure, and public safety. Whether you're a researcher, commuter, traveler, or concerned homeowner, this bundle lets you seamlessly tap into detailed, location-based intelligence from across the entire network.

Each map serves a specific purpose—from helping drivers avoid speed traps to alerting families about nearby environmental hazards. The Syndicated Maps network has earned the trust of millions of users annually, including commuters, journalists, health professionals, and urban planners. 

🚗 Driving, Danger & Traffic Awareness

Why Choose Bad Intersections?

  • Comprehensive Intersection Analysis: Access detailed maps and analytics pinpointing high-risk intersections, including accident data, traffic patterns, and safety ratings.

  • Real-Time Updates: Stay informed with real-time updates on intersection safety status and incidents in your area.

  • Intuitive Interface: Navigate our user-friendly web-based map interface effortlessly, designed for easy access and clarity on any device, without the need for additional downloads.

  • Community-Driven: Join a community committed to safer driving, contributing updates and insights to keep the database current and relevant.

Subscription Benefits

  • Unlimited Access: Enjoy unrestricted access to our comprehensive database from any device, ensuring you're always prepared and informed.

  • Regular Updates: Benefit from continuous updates and new features aimed at enhancing your driving safety and experience.

  • Affordable Plans: Choose from affordable subscription plans tailored to meet the needs of individual drivers, families, and businesses.

Join BadIntersections.com now and drive confidently, knowing you have the information you need to navigate your world safely.

What Makes an Interesection Dangerous for Pedestrians & Cyclists

Key Risk Factors for Pedestrians at Intersections

High Traffic Volume: More vehicles passing through increases collision opportunities. Pedestrians may misjudge when it's safe to cross if cars are numerous or moving in waves.
Poor Visibility: Dim lighting, obstructions like parked trucks or signage, and awkward intersection geometry reduce reaction time for both pedestrians and drivers.
Lack of Infrastructure: Missing or faded crosswalks, no pedestrian signals, inadequate sidewalks, and poor curb ramp design force unsafe crossings.
High Vehicle Speeds: Faster-moving vehicles dramatically raise the risk of severe injury or death.
Dangerous Driver Behavior: Red-light running, illegal turns, and distractions account for many intersection conflicts.

Key Risk Factors for Cyclists at Intersections

No Dedicated Bike Infrastructure: Without bike lanes or protected paths, cyclists are left sharing lanes with cars—often in drivers' blind spots.
Visibility Issues: Large vehicles turning, dense traffic, or low-light conditions make cyclists hard to see.
High Speeds: As with pedestrians, faster vehicle speeds cut reaction time and raise crash severity.
Turning Vehicle Conflicts: Left and right turns often create collision points where drivers overlook approaching cyclists.
Driver Behavior: Distraction, failure to yield, and aggressive maneuvers put cyclists at risk.

Shared Hazards in Intersections

When pedestrians and cyclists are both present, the intersection becomes a hotbed for risk. Crashes can result from multiple compounding factors—high volumes of traffic, poor design, inadequate signaling, and unsafe driver behavior.

How Infrastructure Can Make Intersections Safer

  • Raised Crosswalks and Speed Humps: Slow vehicle approaches and increase pedestrian visibility.

  • Bike Lanes and Protected Intersections: Reduce vehicle-bike interaction.

  • Leading Pedestrian Intervals: Give walkers a head-start before cars get the green light.

  • Curb Extensions and Refuge Islands: Shorten crossing distances and provide safe waiting zones.

  • Improved Lighting and Visibility: Make all users more visible—especially at night.

Enforcement and Behavior Change

Strong laws against red-light violations, speeding, and distracted driving—paired with enforcement and awareness campaigns—can shift behavior and reduce crash rates. Vision Zero initiatives and targeted education also help change norms around yielding to vulnerable users.

State-by-State & City-by-City Comparison: Pedestrian Fatality Rates

Location Metric Value / Rate Notes & Context
United States (overall) Pedestrian fatalities per 100,000 (2023 avg) ~2.18 About one-quarter of these happen at intersections (NHTSA)
California (statewide) % of fatalities at intersections ~27% Urban intersections remain hotspots (SafeTREC)
Memphis, TN Pedestrian deaths per 100k 8.9 One of the highest city rates
Fort Lauderdale, FL Pedestrian deaths per 100k 8.6 Ranked near top nationally
Macon, GA Pedestrian deaths per 100k 7.7 Intersection risks concentrated downtown
Little Rock, AR Pedestrian deaths per 100k 7.5 Smaller city but high fatality ratio
Jackson, MS Pedestrian deaths per 100k 7.4 High risk despite smaller population
New Mexico (statewide) Pedestrian fatality rate per 100k ~4.8 Among the highest state averages
Florida (statewide) Pedestrian fatality rate per 100k ~3.75 One of the most dangerous states
South Carolina (statewide) Pedestrian fatality rate per 100k ~3.66 Safety gaps remain at busy crossings
Arizona (statewide) Pedestrian fatality rate per 100k ~3.41 Growing metro areas amplify risk

State-by-State & City-by-City Comparison: Cyclist Fatality Rates

Location Metric Value / Rate Notes & Context
United States (overall) Cyclist fatalities per 100,000 (2023 avg) ~0.26 National average shows steady increase over the past decade
Florida (statewide) Cyclist fatalities per 100,000 ~0.75 Consistently the most dangerous state for cyclists
Louisiana (statewide) Cyclist fatalities per 100,000 ~0.62 Elevated crash rates in both urban and rural areas
New Mexico (statewide) Cyclist fatalities per 100,000 ~0.57 Among the top three most dangerous states for cycling
California (statewide) Cyclist fatalities per 100,000 ~0.38 Large population, high absolute number of cyclist deaths
Arizona (statewide) Cyclist fatalities per 100,000 ~0.36 High rates in Phoenix and Tucson metro corridors
Tucson, AZ Cyclist fatalities per 100,000 ~1.0 One of the highest urban cyclist fatality rates
Jacksonville, FL Cyclist fatalities per 100,000 ~0.9 Known for wide, high-speed arterial roads
Los Angeles, CA Cyclist fatalities per 100,000 ~0.4 High volume of bike commuters, but vulnerable intersections

What the Tables Reveal

  • City extremes: Memphis and Fort Lauderdale stand out for pedestrian deaths, while Tucson and Jacksonville top the list for cyclist risks.

  • State-level risk: Florida and New Mexico consistently appear in both tables, highlighting systemic challenges for both walkers and cyclists.

  • Intersections as hotspots: A significant share of fatalities for both groups occur at or near intersections, showing these locations are the most critical for safety improvements.

What This Means for Safety Planning

  • Target High-Risk Areas: Cities and states with high death rates should prioritize intersection redesigns, speed control, and protected lanes.

  • Data-Driven Interventions: Collecting and applying crash data can focus resources on the most dangerous crossings.

  • Balanced Approach: Improvements must address both pedestrians and cyclists since both groups share similar vulnerabilities.

  • Statewide Policies: States with recurring high-risk stats need stronger legislation around speed, lighting, and crosswalk design.

  • Public Education: Campaigns aimed at both drivers and vulnerable road users can reduce conflict at intersections.

Conclusion

Intersections remain one of the most dangerous places for pedestrians and cyclists. The challenges—ranging from high speeds and traffic volume to poor infrastructure and risky behaviors—combine to create frequent, harmful conflicts. The supporting tables clarify that in many U.S. states and cities, both pedestrian and cyclist fatality rates are significantly higher than the national average, with intersections consistently at the center of danger. The good news is that solutions exist. By redesigning intersections with better infrastructure, enforcing safer driver behavior, and educating the public, communities can dramatically reduce the risks and make these shared spaces safer for everyone.

Where Are Driverless Uber Cars Being Used? (2025 Update)

Waymo

Where Are Driverless Uber Cars Being Used?

Autonomous vehicles are rapidly becoming part of the transportation landscape, and Uber is one of the companies leading the charge by partnering with self-driving technology leaders like Waymo and WeRide. For riders, policymakers, and business leaders, the most pressing question is: where are driverless Uber cars being used right now? This article explores the current cities where Uber’s autonomous rides are active, the partnerships enabling them, and the future expansion of driverless ride-hailing.

Waymo on Uber: U.S. Deployments

In the United States, Uber has integrated Waymo’s fully autonomous vehicles into its ride-hailing platform in select cities. Austin, Texas, became one of the first cities to allow riders to hail a fully autonomous Waymo Jaguar I-PACE through the Uber app. Riders in specific service zones within Austin can request a ride as usual, and in some cases, the match comes back with a driverless vehicle. In June 2025, Uber and Waymo expanded this collaboration to Atlanta, Georgia, covering a 65-square-mile service area including Downtown and Buckhead. Here, autonomous rides operate at standard UberX or Comfort EV pricing, making the technology more accessible to everyday commuters. Beyond Uber, Waymo independently offers its Waymo One driverless service in cities like Phoenix, San Francisco, Los Angeles, and Silicon Valley. In Phoenix, residents were among the earliest to access fully autonomous rides, and the service now operates across large portions of the metro area. San Francisco riders can hail Waymo One vehicles across the city and nearby Daly City, while Los Angeles has access to a 120-square-mile operating zone. Silicon Valley joined the list in 2025, extending coverage to Mountain View, Palo Alto, Los Altos, and Sunnyvale. This geographic spread shows that Uber’s integration with Waymo is not limited to isolated pilot projects but is part of a broader strategy to embed autonomous vehicles into major metropolitan ride-hailing markets.

International Expansion Through WeRide

Uber’s ambitions for driverless rides extend beyond the U.S., largely through its partnership with WeRide, a Chinese-based autonomous driving company. The most significant example of this collaboration so far is Abu Dhabi in the United Arab Emirates, where Uber riders can hail WeRide autonomous taxis directly through the app. This marks the first time Uber has fully integrated an international autonomous operator into its platform. According to Business Insider, WeRide plans to expand to as many as 15 cities worldwide over the next five years. That roadmap suggests Uber users in other international markets may soon have access to driverless rides without relying solely on U.S.-based partners. WeRide’s collaboration with Uber not only extends Uber’s reach but also accelerates global acceptance of robotaxis by showing how such services can blend into existing ride-hailing apps.

Driverless Uber Cars by Country

Country Cities / Regions Partner Car Models Used Estimated Fleet Size Status
United States Austin, Atlanta (Uber integration); Phoenix, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Silicon Valley (Waymo One independent) Waymo Jaguar I-PACE (all-electric SUV) ~500–700 vehicles across U.S. hubs Active deployments
United States Arlington (pilot), Miami, Washington D.C., Dallas, Denver, New York City (planned) Waymo/Uber Jaguar I-PACE TBD (pilot fleets usually 50–100 vehicles at launch) Pilot / Planned
United Arab Emirates Abu Dhabi WeRide Nissan e-Power EVs, RoboTaxi fleet ~100–200 vehicles Active
United Kingdom London (pilot announced) Wayve/Uber Electric AV test fleet (Wayve-modified EVs) ~50–75 vehicles (pilot scale) Planned pilot
China (future expansion) Global rollout planned via WeRide (15 cities internationally) WeRide RoboTaxi fleet (varies by city, typically EVs) Goal of 1,000+ vehicles globally over 5 years Planned expansion

Pilots, Trials, and Future Deployments

Not every city has active service yet, but several have been identified for upcoming integration. Arlington, Texas, has been highlighted as a future pilot city for Uber’s autonomous fleet. The program is still in development, but Arlington could become the first city in the U.S. to natively integrate autonomous vehicles directly within Uber’s platform on a municipal scale. Other planned expansions include London, where Uber will run a self-driving pilot with Wayve, a UK-based autonomous company. According to MarketWatch, this would be Uber’s most significant European experiment and could pave the way for large-scale adoption across the continent. In the U.S., upcoming service expansions are expected in Miami, Washington D.C., Dallas, Denver, and New York City. Waymo also announced plans to introduce service in Nashville through Lyft in 2026, and while that does not directly involve Uber, it signals a competitive marketplace where autonomous vehicles are quickly becoming mainstream.

Why Some Cities Don’t Have Uber Driverless Cars Yet

Deploying autonomous ride-hailing is far from simple. Each city presents unique challenges that require Uber and its partners to carefully plan deployments. Local regulations play a major role, as some municipalities are more open to AV testing and operations while others maintain strict oversight. Safety is another key factor, as companies must prove their systems can handle complex driving conditions before regulators allow large-scale operation. Infrastructure limitations also matter: dense urban centers with complicated intersections or inconsistent GPS coverage may require more mapping and simulation before a launch. Even in cities where Uber already offers autonomous rides, such as Austin or Atlanta, operations are confined to defined geofenced zones. These zones are chosen based on safety, mapping readiness, and rider demand, meaning not all neighborhoods are covered equally.

Rider Experience in Driverless Ubers

For riders in cities with active deployments, using a driverless Uber is straightforward. They simply order a ride through the Uber app, and if an autonomous vehicle is available, they are matched with it. The rides are typically priced the same as UberX or Comfort tiers, ensuring affordability. The vehicles are fully electric, most commonly the Jaguar I-PACE, equipped with Waymo’s advanced self-driving systems. Riders experience a door-to-door trip with no human driver, monitored remotely for safety and intervention if needed. For Uber, these deployments help reduce reliance on human drivers while aligning with the company’s sustainability goals by focusing on electric vehicle fleets.

Safety and Public Perception

Safety remains the most debated issue in driverless car adoption. Proponents argue that removing human error—the cause of most road accidents—can significantly improve roadway safety. Opponents worry about software glitches, edge-case driving scenarios, and cybersecurity risks. Uber’s decision to partner with companies like Waymo and WeRide reflects a strategy to work with the most experienced developers of self-driving systems. According to Waymo, its vehicles have completed millions of autonomous miles with strong safety records, reinforcing Uber’s case for deployment. Public perception is slowly shifting as more riders experience the technology firsthand. In cities like Phoenix and San Francisco, growing adoption has normalized the idea of hailing a ride with no driver at the wheel.

The Future of Uber’s Driverless Rides

Looking forward, Uber’s roadmap suggests a steady rollout of autonomous vehicles across U.S. cities and global markets. Key trends include integration with electric mobility, expansion of geofenced service zones, and partnerships with international AV companies beyond Waymo and WeRide. London will serve as a testing ground for Uber’s European expansion, while Abu Dhabi shows the viability of driverless services in the Middle East. Meanwhile, U.S. cities like Miami, Dallas, and New York represent opportunities to prove scalability in large, dense markets. If these deployments succeed, Uber may move from offering autonomous rides as a niche option to positioning them as a mainstream feature within its platform.

Conclusion

Driverless Uber cars are no longer an experimental novelty—they are operating today in cities like Austin, Atlanta, Phoenix, San Francisco, Los Angeles, Silicon Valley, and Abu Dhabi. They are soon expanding into London and other major global markets. While challenges remain in regulation, safety validation, and infrastructure readiness, Uber’s partnerships with Waymo, WeRide, and others are accelerating adoption worldwide. For riders, the experience is seamless: open the Uber app, request a ride, and possibly be matched with a fully autonomous vehicle. For Uber, it represents the next frontier in mobility, combining sustainability with cutting-edge technology. The global rollout is still in its early stages, but the foundation is clear: driverless Uber cars are here to stay, and their footprint will only grow in the coming years.

Reckless Driving Definition & State Laws Explained

Reckless driving is one of the most serious traffic violations on the books. Unlike routine speeding or minor moving violations, reckless driving carries criminal consequences in most states. It reflects behavior on the road that shows a willful or wanton disregard for the safety of others. Drivers charged with reckless driving face harsh penalties, including jail time, large fines, license suspension, and a permanent criminal record. Understanding the definition of reckless driving, how states interpret it, and what actions typically lead to charges is essential for every driver.

What Is Reckless Driving?

He Killed Two Cyclists: Why the Driver Will Only Spend a Year in Jail

A Tragedy That Shook Arizona’s Cycling Community

Why Drivers Run Red Lights: Top 10 Reasons & Risks

running red light 

Red light running is one of the most common and dangerous traffic violations worldwide. At nearly every busy intersection, you’ve probably witnessed a driver pushing through just as the light turns red—or worse, long after. This behavior is not only illegal but also a major contributor to car crashes, pedestrian accidents, and traffic fatalities. According to transportation safety studies, thousands of collisions each year are directly linked to red light violations.

Understanding why drivers run red lights is critical for prevention, awareness, and safer driving habits. Below, we’ll break down the ten most common reasons behind this risky behavior, followed by the consequences and strategies to reduce red light running.

1. Impatience and Being in a Hurry

One of the leading causes of red light running is simple impatience. Drivers running late for work, appointments, or flights often decide that saving 30 seconds at an intersection is worth the risk. In congested urban areas, these hurried decisions are especially common. Unfortunately, what feels like a “time saver” can quickly turn into a life-altering collision. The reality is that the few seconds gained by running a red light are negligible compared to the potential consequences of a crash, injury, or death.

2. Distracted Driving

In today’s smartphone-obsessed world, distracted driving has become a crisis on its own. Texting, scrolling social media, eating, adjusting navigation apps, or even talking with passengers can divert attention long enough to miss a signal change. A distracted driver might not notice a light turning red until it’s too late, leading them to inadvertently enter the intersection against traffic. Because distraction slows reaction time, even a small lapse in focus can be deadly at intersections where pedestrians and cross-traffic have the right of way.

3. Intoxication and Impaired Judgment

Alcohol and drugs significantly impair judgment, reaction times, and coordination. An intoxicated driver may misjudge the timing of a yellow light, or fail to even register a red signal altogether. Studies consistently show that impaired drivers are overrepresented in red light running crashes. This is one reason DUI laws are strictly enforced, as impaired decision-making combined with intersection traffic is a recipe for disaster.

4. Reckless Driving

Reckless drivers—those who speed excessively, weave through lanes, or treat road rules as optional—are naturally more prone to running red lights. For these individuals, the violation may not be an accident but rather an intentional act of defiance. Their behavior endangers not only themselves but everyone else sharing the road. Intersections become particularly hazardous when reckless drivers assume they can “beat the light” at high speeds.

5. Inexperience Behind the Wheel

New drivers often lack the experience and situational awareness to anticipate light changes or judge stopping distances. They may also underestimate the importance of complete compliance with traffic signals. Inexperience can lead to hesitation or confusion at intersections, sometimes resulting in accidental red light running. Driver education programs stress the importance of defensive driving, but without practice, young drivers may still make critical errors.

6. Emergency Situations

Not every red light violation stems from negligence. Sometimes drivers run red lights to respond to emergencies—whether rushing someone to the hospital, trying to escape a dangerous situation, or avoiding a collision. While most jurisdictions allow emergency vehicles like ambulances, police cars, and fire trucks to lawfully pass red lights with sirens on, private drivers are still required to stop. Even in emergencies, running a light carries high risks that could make the situation worse.

7. Aggressive Driving

Aggressive drivers share similarities with reckless ones, but their actions are often fueled by road rage or frustration. Tailgating, cutting off other vehicles, and accelerating through yellow lights are all forms of aggressive driving that frequently result in red light running. These drivers may feel entitled to maintain their pace regardless of signals, prioritizing their own convenience over safety.

8. Confusion at Intersections

Not all red light running is intentional. In complicated intersections with multiple signals, turn arrows, or poor signage, drivers may genuinely become confused. For example, a motorist might mistake a green arrow for a green light in their lane, or misinterpret flashing signals. Confusion is especially common for visitors unfamiliar with local traffic laws, such as right-on-red rules or flashing red/yellow patterns. Poor visibility and faded markings can make matters worse.

9. Mechanical Issues

Though rare, mechanical failures like brake malfunctions or stuck accelerators can force a driver through an intersection against their will. Regular vehicle maintenance is crucial to minimize this risk, as even well-intentioned drivers are helpless if their car won’t stop. When investigating collisions, authorities sometimes discover faulty equipment played a role in a red light violation.

10. Weather and Road Conditions

Weather is a powerful factor in traffic safety. Wet or icy roads increase stopping distances, and drivers traveling too fast for conditions may be unable to stop when the light turns red. Fog can also reduce visibility so severely that drivers don’t notice the signal until it’s too late. Defensive driving—slowing down, leaving extra space, and anticipating slick conditions—is the best protection against weather-related violations.

The Consequences of Running Red Lights

Running a red light is never a minor infraction. The consequences ripple far beyond the driver:

Collisions and Crashes

Intersections are some of the most dangerous areas on the road. Red light running often leads to T-bone collisions, side-impact crashes, and accidents involving pedestrians and cyclists. These types of crashes are among the deadliest because the sides of vehicles offer less protection than the front or rear.

Injuries and Fatalities

Victims of red light crashes may suffer broken bones, traumatic brain injuries, spinal cord damage, or worse. According to traffic safety reports, hundreds of fatalities annually are attributed to red light violations in the United States alone.

Legal and Financial Penalties

A single violation can carry steep fines, points on your license, and possible suspension for repeat offenders. Some states even use red light cameras to automatically ticket violators. Beyond legal trouble, insurance companies often raise rates significantly after a red light ticket or crash.

Increased Traffic Congestion

When collisions occur at intersections, traffic flow is disrupted. Emergency response, investigations, and blocked lanes can create backups that ripple through city streets for hours.

How to Prevent Red Light Running

The good news is that red light running is entirely preventable. Here are key strategies for drivers:

  • Slow down before intersections rather than speeding up to beat the light.

  • Stay alert by putting away your phone and reducing in-car distractions.

  • Plan ahead so you don’t feel pressured to rush through lights.

  • Respect yellow lights as a signal to prepare to stop, not an excuse to accelerate.

  • Maintain your vehicle to ensure brakes and tires are in top condition.

  • Adjust for weather by leaving more stopping distance and driving cautiously.

  • Stay calm even when frustrated, remembering that safety is worth more than a few seconds saved.

Conclusion: Safety Over Speed

Running a red light might seem like a small risk when you’re late or distracted, but it’s one of the most dangerous choices a driver can make. Whether caused by impatience, intoxication, weather, or confusion, every red light violation puts lives at stake. By staying attentive, patient, and prepared, drivers can help make intersections safer for everyone.

Next time you approach a yellow light, ask yourself: Is saving a few seconds really worth risking someone’s life?

Are Most People Aware of Dangerous Intersections When They See Them?

Intersections are where the flow of traffic, pedestrians, and cyclists meet—and often where the highest number of crashes occur. In nearly every city, there are intersections that locals know to avoid or approach with extra caution. But the question remains: are most people aware of dangerous intersections when they see them?

This article explores how drivers perceive intersection risks, the factors that make some crossroads more dangerous than others, and what can be done to increase awareness and safety.

Why Intersections Are Inherently Risky

Unlike straight stretches of road, intersections force drivers to make multiple simultaneous decisions—when to stop, when to yield, whether to accelerate, and how to avoid oncoming traffic. Add pedestrians, cyclists, and traffic signals to the mix, and the margin for error narrows.

According to the Federal Highway Administration, over 50% of serious accidents happen at or near intersections. This makes them one of the most dangerous points in the transportation network.

What Makes an Intersection Dangerous?

Not all intersections are created equal. Some seem perfectly safe at first glance but conceal hidden hazards. Others are visibly chaotic, making drivers tense as soon as they approach.

Key factors that contribute to dangerous intersections include:

  • High traffic volume – The more vehicles, the greater the chance of conflict points.

  • Poor visibility – Buildings, trees, or parked cars can block sightlines.

  • Complicated design – Multiple lanes, odd angles, or confusing signage increase driver hesitation.

  • Frequent speeding – Wide roads or downhill approaches encourage drivers to go too fast.

  • Pedestrian and cyclist traffic – Intersections near schools, parks, or commercial centers introduce added risks.

Some intersections combine several of these elements, making crashes almost inevitable unless countermeasures are introduced.

Do Drivers Recognize Dangerous Intersections?

Locals vs. Visitors

Local residents often know which intersections in their city are risky. They may instinctively slow down, avoid certain turns, or even reroute to stay safe. Visitors, on the other hand, lack that insider knowledge. This gap in awareness is why many accidents involve out-of-town drivers unfamiliar with the area.

The Role of Experience

Experienced drivers may notice red flags—like poor sightlines or heavy cross-traffic—before entering an intersection. New drivers, however, may only learn through trial and error. Unfortunately, that learning curve sometimes comes with collisions or near-misses.

Perception vs. Reality

Interestingly, research shows that drivers often overestimate their awareness of risk. They may assume they can spot a dangerous intersection on sight, but many hazards are invisible until too late. For example, a seemingly quiet suburban intersection could hide a history of rear-end crashes due to short yellow light times.

Why People Miss the Warning Signs

Even at obviously risky intersections, not everyone recognizes the danger. Here’s why:

  1. Distraction – Smartphones, navigation systems, or in-car entertainment pull attention away.

  2. Overconfidence – Experienced drivers may believe they can handle any situation.

  3. Unfamiliarity – Out-of-town drivers are focused on directions, not subtle traffic cues.

  4. Lack of data – Drivers don’t have access to historical crash statistics while on the road.

The reality is that danger isn’t always intuitive. An intersection’s risk may come from design flaws invisible to the naked eye.

The Psychology of Risk Awareness

Humans are wired to notice obvious threats—like another car running a red light—but not gradual or systemic risks. This is why many people fail to identify dangerous intersections until after they’ve experienced or witnessed a crash.

Studies in traffic psychology show that familiarity reduces perceived danger. If a driver passes through a hazardous intersection daily without incident, they may stop seeing it as risky, even if crash data says otherwise.

Technology and Data: Making Hidden Dangers Visible

Thanks to advances in mapping, analytics, and crowdsourcing, drivers no longer have to rely solely on personal experience to recognize danger. Tools like dangerous intersection maps, crash heat maps, and navigation apps with safety alerts are bridging the awareness gap.

Websites such as BadIntersections.com and municipal open-data portals publish crash statistics, giving residents insight into where accidents frequently occur. Some navigation systems are beginning to integrate this data, warning drivers as they approach historically hazardous spots.

Case Studies: Famous Dangerous Intersections

  • Times Square, New York City – Once notorious for pedestrian accidents, redesign efforts with pedestrian plazas drastically reduced collisions.

  • Hollywood & Highland, Los Angeles – Heavy tourist foot traffic and complex signals made this intersection risky until crossing improvements were introduced.

  • Lake Shore Drive & Belmont, Chicago – Known for sudden merges and high speeds, local drivers often approach with extreme caution.

These examples highlight that while some intersections "look" dangerous, others only reveal their risk through accident history and data.

Improving Awareness

Public Education

Cities can run awareness campaigns, highlighting high-risk intersections through local media or social channels.

Better Signage

Warning signs before difficult intersections remind drivers to slow down or prepare for unusual conditions.

Technology Integration

Navigation apps that provide “danger alerts” could dramatically reduce accidents by warning unfamiliar drivers before they reach a problem area.

Community Reporting

Crowdsourced platforms allow residents to share experiences, helping others avoid the same hazards.

What Drivers Can Do

Drivers who want to protect themselves should adopt a proactive mindset:

  1. Research before driving – Check online maps of crash-prone intersections.

  2. Stay alert at all crossings – Assume intersections are higher-risk zones.

  3. Follow defensive driving techniques – Look left, right, and left again before entering.

  4. Reduce speed – Approaching more slowly buys extra reaction time.

Awareness is the first step toward avoiding collisions, but behavior change is equally important.

The Bottom Line

So, are most people aware of dangerous intersections when they see them? The answer is: partly. While locals may recognize some obvious trouble spots, many hazards are hidden from view and only revealed through data. Out-of-town drivers and distracted commuters are especially vulnerable.

Increasing awareness through technology, public education, and community reporting can help bridge the gap. Until then, every driver should treat intersections with caution—because even the safest-looking crossroads may hold hidden dangers.

When Google Maps Sends You Into Dangerous Neighborhoods: A Rio de Janeiro Story

Navigation apps like Google Maps are indispensable for modern drivers. They guide us through traffic, suggest shortcuts, and promise the fastest way to our destination. But in cities like Rio de Janeiro, the “fastest” route can sometimes be the most dangerous. A chilling number of drivers have learned that one wrong turn can put them directly into the crosshairs of armed criminal factions.

One Wrong Turn Into a Favela

Late on a Monday night, a Rio resident set out to pick up his fiancée from college. Unfamiliar with part of the route, he carefully planned his trip in advance, adding waypoints to avoid neighborhoods he knew were unsafe. But once on the road, his app automatically rerouted him, probably flashing a notification he didn’t see while focused on driving. Moments later, he found himself deep inside one of Rio’s most notorious favelas—an area where even locals avoid entry after dark.

For residents, this is not just an inconvenience. It’s life or death. Entering a territory controlled by armed groups can trigger immediate violence. Theft is often the least concern; survival is the priority.

When GPS Mistakes Turn Deadly

This story is not isolated. In February 2025, UOL/AFP reported on a string of tragedies where GPS misdirection proved fatal:

  • An Argentine tourist leaving Cristo Redentor was routed by GPS into Morro dos Prazeres. He was shot and later died in the hospital.
  • A São Paulo woman traveling by Uber was killed when her driver was misrouted into a gang-controlled neighborhood. A single shot to the neck ended her life instantly.
  • In another viral case, a rideshare driver was filmed begging for his life after mistakenly entering Cidade Alta, surrounded by heavily armed men.

According to Rio’s crime-tracking institute, 19 people were shot in 2024 after accidentally entering favelas—five fatally. Authorities warn that control of these areas can shift in days, leaving drivers without clear safe paths. As one security official put it: criminals often “shoot first and ask questions later.”

Why Navigation Apps Fail at Safety

Navigation algorithms are designed for efficiency. They weigh distance, time, tolls, and traffic. What they don’t account for is crime. To a navigation app, an unlit road through a gang-controlled neighborhood looks just as valid as a well-patrolled avenue. The result: unsuspecting drivers can be sent into danger zones simply because the app sees them as faster routes.

How Drivers Can Protect Themselves

Until mapping platforms improve, drivers need practical strategies:

  1. Add multiple waypoints. Forcing the app to follow your chosen path can reduce automatic rerouting.
  2. Compare apps. Check if different services suggest the same path, and avoid shortcuts through unknown neighborhoods.
  3. Download offline maps. Prevents your app from auto-adjusting routes when service drops in risky areas.
  4. Ask locals. Residents often know which streets are unsafe and can recommend safer alternatives.

Global Lessons Beyond Rio

While Rio is a dramatic example, this problem exists in cities worldwide. In Johannesburg, Mexico City, or even parts of U.S. cities like Detroit or Chicago, dangerous neighborhoods sit right alongside tourist attractions and major highways. A navigation system blind to crime risk is a recipe for tragedy wherever local knowledge matters as much as road design.

BadIntersections.com: Expanding Beyond Accidents

This is where community-driven safety mapping can make a difference. At BadIntersections.com, we’ve long documented intersections prone to crashes. But now, drivers can also add dangerous crime areas directly to the map database. If you know of a street, intersection, or neighborhood where entering carries a serious risk, you can log it for others to see before they drive blindly into danger.

This tool empowers everyday drivers to share what navigation apps ignore. By crowdsourcing crime-zone awareness alongside crash data, the map builds a fuller picture of where risk really lies. Your contribution could be the reason another driver avoids a fatal wrong turn.

Technology’s Responsibility

Ultimately, mapping companies must step up. If apps already let users avoid toll roads or ferries, why not unsafe areas? Public crime data exists and could be integrated into routing algorithms. Until then, it falls to communities, journalists, and local governments to fill the gap—and to drivers to remain vigilant.

Final Thoughts

The Rio stories are grim reminders that speed is not worth the risk. Following GPS blindly can turn a beautiful drive from “paradise to death,” as one report described. Technology should never prioritize efficiency over human life. By planning carefully, seeking local input, and contributing danger zones to shared maps, we can make navigation safer until the big platforms finally catch up.


Have you ever been misrouted into a dangerous area by GPS? Share your story and add known crime zones to Bad Intersections. Together, we can prevent the next tragedy.

Are Poorly Designed Intersections Costing Lives?

Every driver has experienced a confusing or dangerous intersection — lanes that don’t line up, signals that don’t make sense, or blind corners that force risky decisions. But beyond frustration, these poorly designed intersections can have deadly consequences. According to the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA), more than 25% of all traffic fatalities in the United States occur at or near intersections. The design of these intersections often plays a larger role in crashes than driver error alone.

Why Intersection Design Matters

How to Use Streetmix to Design Safer Intersections

Streetmix is a powerful online tool that allows anyone—from city planners to concerned residents—to create street cross-section diagrams. It’s especially useful when advocating for improvements at dangerous intersections where pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers face safety risks. With Streetmix, you can visualize traffic-calming strategies like narrower lanes, protected bike paths, raised crosswalks, and median islands—all from your browser. 

How to Anticipate a Dangerous Intersection and What to Do

Intersections are where most serious traffic conflicts happen. According to the Federal Highway Administration, over 50% of injury crashes and roughly 25% of all traffic fatalities occur at intersections. While many are routine, others are deceptively dangerous — especially if you're unfamiliar with the area.

Worst Intersection in Every U.S. State

What Is the Worst Intersection in Your State?

Intersections are among the most dangerous places on the road. According to the Federal Highway Administration, nearly 50% of all traffic injuries in the U.S. occur at or near intersections. But which ones are the worst? Below is a curated list of the most dangerous or crash-prone intersection in each U.S. state, based on data from traffic reports, local news, insurance claims, and city accident statistics.

Worst Intersections by State (50-State List)

State Worst Intersection City Reason
Alabama US 280 & Valleydale Rd Hoover High-speed collisions and frequent congestion
Alaska Seward Hwy & Tudor Rd Anchorage Heavy commuter traffic and poor visibility
Arizona 19th Ave & Camelback Rd Phoenix High pedestrian and vehicle incident rate
Arkansas I-30 & I-630 Interchange Little Rock Complex ramps and merging accidents
California Devonshire St & Reseda Blvd Los Angeles High accident rate, especially at night
Colorado Parker Rd & I-225 Aurora Multi-lane confusion and rear-end collisions
Connecticut I-84 & I-91 Interchange Hartford Congestion and sudden lane changes
Delaware US 13 & DE 273 New Castle Frequent red-light running and crashes
Florida SR 826 & SR 836 Miami High-speed accidents and congestion
Georgia I-285 & I-85 (Spaghetti Junction) Atlanta One of the most complex interchanges in the U.S.
Hawaii H1 & Middle Street Honolulu Constant traffic and confusing merges
Idaho Eagle Rd & Fairview Ave Boise High-volume corridor with many crashes
Illinois Stony Island & South Chicago Ave Chicago Frequent T-bone accidents and red-light running
Indiana US 30 & Coliseum Blvd Fort Wayne Heavy turning traffic and frequent crashes
Iowa I-235 & 2nd Avenue Des Moines High-speed crashes and merging conflicts
Kansas Kellogg Dr & Rock Rd Wichita Multiple lanes and accident clusters
Kentucky Dixie Hwy & Greenwood Rd Louisville Red-light running and pedestrian injuries
Louisiana I-10 & College Dr Baton Rouge Frequent fender-benders and backups
Maine Forest Ave & Woodford St Portland Confusing turn lanes and high crash rate
Maryland I-695 & I-70 Interchange Baltimore Heavy truck traffic and speeding
Massachusetts Mass Ave & Melnea Cass Blvd Boston High pedestrian traffic and confusion
Michigan I-75 & I-696 Detroit Merge zone crashes and congestion
Minnesota I-94 & Hiawatha Ave Minneapolis Traffic signal timing issues
Mississippi US 49 & Hardy St Hattiesburg High speeds and commercial traffic
Missouri I-70 & I-270 St. Louis One of the busiest and most dangerous areas
Montana Reserve St & Brooks St Missoula Multiple turn lanes and visibility issues
Nebraska 72nd St & Dodge St Omaha Crash-prone due to turning conflicts
Nevada Sahara Ave & Decatur Blvd Las Vegas Dense traffic and distracted driving
New Hampshire NH 101 & I-93 Manchester High-speed collisions and ramp issues
New Jersey Route 4 & Route 17 Paramus Heavy mall traffic and bottlenecks
New Mexico Carlisle Blvd & Central Ave Albuquerque Pedestrian accidents and red-light running
New York Atlantic Ave & Flatbush Ave Brooklyn Heavy congestion and pedestrian risk
North Carolina I-485 & US 74 Charlotte High-speed merging and frequent accidents
North Dakota 13th Ave S & 45th St Fargo Heavy retail traffic and signal issues
Ohio I-71 & I-70 Columbus Congested interchange with high crash rate
Oklahoma I-40 & I-44 Oklahoma City Truck-heavy traffic and complex merges
Oregon 82nd Ave & Powell Blvd Portland High crash frequency and pedestrian risk
Pennsylvania Boulevard of the Allies & Bates St Pittsburgh Sharp turns and merging problems
Rhode Island I-95 & RI-10 Providence High volume and poor signage
South Carolina US 17 & SC 707 Myrtle Beach Vacation traffic and signal delays
South Dakota 41st St & Louise Ave Sioux Falls Retail corridor with heavy congestion
Tennessee I-24 & I-40 Interchange Nashville Speeding and bottlenecks
Texas I-35 & US 290 Austin Frequent rear-end crashes and congestion
Utah 12300 S & State St Draper Dangerous turning movements and signal issues
Vermont US 2 & Montpelier Junction Rd Montpelier Visibility and weather-related crashes
Virginia I-95 & I-495 (Springfield Interchange) Springfield Congested with multiple exit lanes
Washington SR 99 & 1st Ave S Seattle Truck traffic and lane confusion
West Virginia I-64 & I-77 Charleston Merge-related accidents
Wisconsin I-94 & I-894 Milwaukee Heavy commuter and truck traffic
Wyoming Yellowstone Hwy & Beverly St Casper Driver misjudgment and limited sight lines

Why These Intersections Matter

Knowing your state’s most dangerous intersection can help you be more alert when traveling through these high-risk areas. Whether due to confusing lane changes, poor signage, or sheer volume of traffic, these intersections consistently see more collisions than average. Drivers should use extra caution when approaching these areas and consider using real-time traffic navigation tools like Waze or Google Maps with traffic alerts enabled.

Stay Safe and Informed

Drive defensively, avoid distractions, and report unsafe intersections to your local Department of Transportation. For more detailed traffic data, explore reports from the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA).

Why E-Bike Speed Limits Are Capped at 15 MPH and Kids Need a License

🚦 Why the 15 MPH Speed Cap Matters

  1. Safer Streets, Fewer Crashes
    Lower speeds mean quicker reaction times. At 15 mph, riders, particularly younger ones, can better avoid hazards. This curb in speed significantly reduces accident severity and collision risks.

  2. Compatible Infrastructure
    Most bike lanes and mixed-use pathways weren’t built for high-speed electric vehicles. Limiting speed helps e‑bikes blend safely with standard bikes, scooters, and walkers.

  3. Liability & Insurance Stability
    E‑bikes above 15 mph start to resemble mopeds in risk level. Governments and schools are concerned about liability, especially for under‑18 riders. Speed caps help avoid excessive legal and medical costs.

👶 Why Minors Often Need Licenses or Minimum Age Limits

1. Limited Road Experience

Children lack the traffic awareness that develops over time. In response, many areas enforce age limits or require training before riding a fast e‑bike.

2. Managing Risky Behavior

Licensing introduces accountability, like revoking privileges after infractions, akin to driver’s license systems.

3. Reducing Teen Injuries

With e‑bike-related ER visits rising, especially among youth, licensing ensures riders understand road laws, proper signaling, and helmet use.

📋 State-by-State Licensing & Age Rules for E‑Bike Riders

California

  • 🚲 Class 1 & 2 (20 mph max): No license or minimum age required; helmet mandatory for riders under 18.

  • Class 3 (28 mph): Riders must be 16+, helmet required regardless of age. 

  • New California proposals may ban under‑12s and require licensing for faster e‑bikes, though not yet enacted.

  • Minimum riding age: 14+ for all e‑bike classes. Riders 14–17 must wear helmets. No license needed for standard Class 1 & 2. 

Florida

  • Riders must be 16+ to operate any e‑bike. Helmets are mandatory for those under 16. No driver’s license or registration required.

Washington

  • Class 1 & 2 (20 mph): No age or license required.

  • Class 3 (28 mph): Riders must be 16+, and bike must display class, speed, and wattage labels. 

🧠 Summary Table: Youth E‑Bike Rules by State

State Min Age License Required Helmet Rule
CA (Class 1&2); 16+ (Class 3) No Under 18 on Class 1/2; anyone on Class 3 must helmet
NY 14+ No Riders 14–17 must wear helmets
FL 16+ No Under‑16 riders must wear helmets
WA 16+ for Class 3 No Helmet required per state bike standards

(Note: Many other states follow similar patterns—no license for standard e‑bikes, age limit of 14–16 for faster classes, and mandatory helmet laws.)

🧭 Final Takeaways

  • 15 mph caps on juvenile-friendly e‑bikes minimize injuries and align with shared-path speeds.

  • Licensing or age rules, especially for “waisted” Class 3 bikes, reflect efforts to ensure youth have the necessary knowledge and maturity.

  • Parental guidance is key: Check bike class (1, 2 or 3), local rules, wear helmets, and reinforce safe riding habits.

🙋 FAQ

Q: Can a 14‑year‑old ride a Class 2 e‑bike?
Yes—in most states, they can ride Class 2 (20 mph) without a license, but may still need a helmet and must meet any minimum state age requirements.

Q: Is a license ever required?
Generally, no for Classes 1 & 2. Only in a few states are faster e‑bikes (Class 3 or moped-level) treated like motor vehicles, requiring a license, registration, or insurance.

Q: What qualifies as Class 1, 2, 3?

  • Class 1: Pedal‑assist up to 20 mph

  • Class 2: Throttle‑assist up to 20 mph

  • Class 3: Pedal‑assist up to 28 mph (often needs age 16+)

By capping speeds and focusing on age‑appropriate licensing, e‑bike laws aim to protect the youngest riders while embracing clean, efficient urban mobility. Feel free to ask if you'd like a map of local rules or tailored guidance for your city!

Michigan Left vs. Roundabouts: Which Improves Traffic Flow Better?

🚦 Introduction: Two Modern Traffic Solutions, One Common Goal

Across the U.S., cities are replacing outdated intersections with smarter solutions. Two of the most studied are the Michigan Left and the roundabout—both designed to improve safety, reduce delays, and move traffic efficiently.

But which performs better in real-world conditions?

🔁 What Is a Michigan Left?

A Michigan Left Turn eliminates direct left turns at signalized intersections. Instead, drivers:

  1. Turn right,

  2. Make a U-turn about 500–1,000 feet down the road,

  3. Proceed straight.

🔹 Benefits:

  • Reduces conflict points from 32 (standard 4-way) to 14.

  • Shortens signal cycle lengths, allowing 8–25% more green time for through traffic.

  • Improves traffic throughput on major arterials.

🔹 Data (MDOT & FHWA):

  • Angle crash reduction: up to 60%

  • Travel time reduced by 18–25% during peak hours

  • Right-angle and rear-end crashes drop by 20–50%

🔄 What Is a Roundabout?

A roundabout is a circular intersection where drivers yield on entry, merge, and exit without stopping at signals.

🔹 Benefits:

  • Keeps vehicles moving (no signal delay)

  • Forces lower speeds, reducing severity of crashes

  • Fewer pedestrian conflict points (just 8 vs. 16+ in traditional intersections)

🔹 Data (FHWA & IIHS):

  • 90% reduction in fatal crashes

  • 75% reduction in injury crashes

  • 37% reduction in all crashes

  • Average speed through roundabouts: 15–25 mph

  • Capacity: up to 2,000 vehicles/hour

📊 Traffic Flow Comparison Table

Feature Michigan Left Roundabout
Signal Required? Yes (modified, shorter phases) No
Max Throughput (peak lanes) 1,600–1,800 vehicles/hour 1,200–2,000 vehicles/hour
Avg Speed 35–50 mph (main route) 15–25 mph (slower but steady)
Crash Reduction (All Types) 30–50% 37–75%
Pedestrian Safety Medium (longer crossing paths) High (slower speeds, shorter distances)
Conflict Points 14 8
Driver Learning Curve Steeper for new users Moderate, improves with experience

📣 Public Perception

Michigan Lefts:

  • Confusing at first for new drivers

  • Michigan residents are generally supportive

  • Surveys (MDOT, 2018): 65% of users rate the system “favorable” after use

Roundabouts:

  • Initial opposition is common (60–70% before construction)

  • Acceptance grows significantly post-installation

  • Studies show average approval jumps to 80% after 6 months of use

🏆 Verdict: Depends on Context

Use Case Best Solution
High-speed arterial roads Michigan Left
Urban, walkable intersections Roundabout
Limited space Michigan Left
Safety focus Roundabout

Roundabouts excel in urban settings with lower speeds and pedestrians, while Michigan Lefts handle high-volume suburban arterials more effectively.

📌 Final Thoughts

Choosing between a Michigan Left or a roundabout isn’t a one-size-fits-all decision. Each design has trade-offs—what’s crucial is aligning the solution with traffic volumes, driver behavior, and roadway context.

Sources:

Driverless Waymo Pulled Over by Phoenix Police Caught on Video

A viral video out of Phoenix, Arizona shows police pulling over a fully autonomous Waymo vehicle—with no one in the driver’s seat. The incident, captured by a nearby motorist, has sparked a wave of concern over how driverless cars behave in high-pressure, real-world scenarios such as police stops, detours, and construction zones.

What Happened

In the video:

  • A Waymo car entered a construction zone and briefly drove into oncoming traffic.

  • Phoenix police activated their lights to intervene.

  • The car did not initially respond or pull over properly.

  • Eventually, it stopped—though with no human driver to engage, police appeared unsure how to handle the situation.

The Waymo vehicle reportedly attempted to "correct" its position mid-stop, further complicating the traffic stop.

Waymo’s Statement

Waymo acknowledged the event, stating that the vehicle experienced a "challenging situation" due to unexpected road signage and lane shifts. The company said it is analyzing the incident and working to refine its AI response to emergency vehicles and construction reroutes.

Rising AV Incidents: The Bigger Picture

This isn’t an isolated case. Incidents involving Waymo and other autonomous vehicle operators are being documented with increasing frequency—especially in cities that have allowed full driverless operation.

Notable Statistics:

  • San Francisco emergency services reported 55 AV-related disruptions in just six months of 2023, including blocked fire trucks and ambulances.

  • In Phoenix, at least 12 driverless vehicle incidents were reported to local authorities between 2022 and 2024, according to the Arizona Department of Transportation.

  • A Consumer Reports survey from late 2024 found that 63% of Americans are “not confident” in current AV safety standards.

  • Over 500 formal complaints about AV behavior were filed with the NHTSA (National Highway Traffic Safety Administration) in 2023 alone.

Other Cities Seeing AV Safety Concerns

San Francisco, CA

  • Waymo and Cruise vehicles have stalled in intersections, blocked emergency responders, and confused school zones.

  • In one incident, multiple AVs surrounded an active fire scene, preventing a hose from being connected.

Austin, TX

  • Waymo vehicles were documented blocking lanes during peak traffic.

  • Complaints also cited robotaxis stopping in mid-turn due to confused traffic light signals.

Los Angeles, CA

  • Several neighborhoods have reported AVs double-parking, idling in bike lanes, and failing to yield to pedestrians in crosswalks.

The Legal and Safety Implications

These incidents raise difficult questions:

  • Who’s liable when there’s no driver?

  • How can law enforcement interact with vehicles that can’t respond verbally?

  • Are current state regulations and oversight strong enough to keep pace with technology?

As AV testing expands, so does the gap between technology and accountability.

Final Thoughts

The Phoenix video is more than just viral content—it’s a wake-up call. While Waymo and others promise improvements, incidents like this show that real-world driving still presents too many edge cases for AVs to handle with full confidence.

Until comprehensive oversight, public trust, and technical reliability are in sync, driverless cars remain a high-tech experiment with very real-world consequences.

50 Dangerous U.S. Neighborhoods Tourists Should Avoid

When you're visiting a new city, it's easy to assume that all neighborhoods are equally safe—but that's not the case. Crime tends to concentrate in specific pockets, and knowing where those areas are can help you stay out of trouble while traveling.

This guide from Blog.BadIntersections.com identifies 50 U.S. cities with neighborhoods travelers should avoid, especially after dark. We’ve included crime statistics, local insight, and practical travel tips to help you navigate unfamiliar ground safely.

Why Certain Neighborhoods Are Riskier

Crime isn’t randomly distributed. According to the Bureau of Justice Statistics, over 50% of urban violent crime occurs in just 5% of city blocks. Neighborhoods with high poverty, gang activity, or inadequate policing often see higher rates of assault, robbery, and homicide.

For travelers, even a brief detour into the wrong area can result in car break-ins, scams, or worse. That’s why we compiled this list using FBI data, local crime reports, and real traveler reviews.

The 50 Worst Neighborhoods for Tourists to Avoid in the U.S.

🔴 1–10: High-Crime Zones in America’s Biggest Cities

  1. Chicago, ILWest Garfield Park, Englewood, South Shore

    West Garfield Park has 131.8 violent crimes per 1,000 residents, the city’s highest.

  2. Los Angeles, CASkid Row, South LA, Watts

    Skid Row is home to 4,400+ unhoused individuals and widespread open-air drug use.

  3. San Francisco, CATenderloin, Civic Center

    Drug overdoses here are 10× the city average.

  4. New York City, NYBrownsville (Brooklyn), South Bronx

    Brownsville has some of NYC’s highest shooting rates.

  5. Philadelphia, PAKensington, North Philly

    Kensington is the epicenter of the fentanyl crisis.

  6. Baltimore, MDSandtown-Winchester, Cherry Hill

    Over 300 murders citywide in 2023, many concentrated here.

  7. Detroit, MIWarrendale, Brightmoor, Dexter-Linwood

    Detroit’s violent crime rate is 2.5× the national average.

  8. St. Louis, MOWells-Goodfellow, College Hill

    Ranked #1 for murders per capita in the U.S.

  9. New Orleans, LACentral City, 7th Ward

    Homicides in 2023 rose by 20% in these neighborhoods.

  10. Atlanta, GABankhead, Vine City

Gun violence in Bankhead is consistently among the city’s worst.

🟠 11–30: Cities with Surging Crime Clusters

  1. Cleveland, OHGlenville, Kinsman

  2. Washington, DCAnacostia, Trinidad

  3. Milwaukee, WIMetcalfe Park, Amani

  4. Memphis, TNFrayser, Orange Mound

  5. Oakland, CAEast Oakland, Acorn

  6. Houston, TXSunnyside, Acres Homes

  7. Dallas, TXSouth Dallas, Pleasant Grove

  8. Indianapolis, INHaughville, Near Eastside

  9. Kansas City, MOEast Side, Ivanhoe

  10. Cincinnati, OHAvondale, West End

  11. Miami, FLOvertown, Liberty City

  12. Orlando, FLParramore, Washington Shores

  13. Tampa, FLEast Tampa, Sulphur Springs

  14. Las Vegas, NVNaked City, North Las Vegas (some parts)

  15. Phoenix, AZMaryvale, South Phoenix

  16. San Antonio, TXDenver Heights, Eastwood Village

  17. Fresno, CAEdison, Central Fresno

  18. Sacramento, CAOak Park, Del Paso Heights

  19. Albuquerque, NMInternational District, Trumbull

  20. Birmingham, ALEnsley, North Birmingham

🟡 31–50: Underrated But Risky

  1. Anchorage, AKMountain View, Spenard

  2. Jackson, MSWashington Addition, West Jackson

  3. Rochester, NYLyell-Otis, Upper Falls

  4. Buffalo, NYBroadway-Fillmore, East Side

  5. Bridgeport, CTEast End, Hollow

  6. Hartford, CTClay-Arsenal, North End

  7. Springfield, MAMason Square, Liberty Heights

  8. Wilmington, DESouthbridge, West Center City

  9. Camden, NJWhitman Park, Waterfront South

  10. Paterson, NJ4th Ward, South Paterson

  11. Newark, NJSouth Ward, Central Ward

  12. Stockton, CAAirport Way, South Stockton

  13. Lansing, MINorthwest Lansing, Knollwood

  14. Toledo, OHJunction, North End

  15. Flint, MINorth Flint, Civic Park

  16. Charleston, SCNorth Charleston (some areas)

  17. Columbia, SCFarrow Hills, North Columbia

  18. Little Rock, ARSouthwest Little Rock, East End

  19. Oklahoma City, OKSpencer, NE 23rd St Corridor

  20. Tulsa, OKNorth Tulsa, Turley

How to Stay Safe in an Unfamiliar City

Traveling smart can make all the difference. Use these pro tips:

  • Check crime maps before booking lodging.

  • Avoid walking alone in poorly lit or unfamiliar areas.

  • Use rideshare apps instead of public transit late at night.

  • Blend in. Don’t wear flashy jewelry or carry expensive gear visibly.

  • Ask locals (hotel staff, Uber drivers) where not to go.

Final Thoughts

While no city is entirely safe or unsafe, knowing which neighborhoods to avoid can prevent theft, scams, and dangerous encounters. These 50 U.S. cities all have great attractions—but also pockets where caution is critical.

At Blog.BadIntersections.com, we help travelers navigate America’s most dangerous streets and intersections—so you don’t have to learn the hard way.

Top Self-Driving Car Companies: Major Differences & Deployment

Self Driving Car Company Logos

Leading Self-Driving Car Companies and Their Deployment Strategies

The advent of autonomous driving cars marks a significant shift in the automotive industry, with several companies spearheading this technological revolution. Each company has developed distinct approaches and technologies, tailored to their vision of the future of autonomous driving. This article delves into some of the top self-driving car companies and explores where and how they are deploying their technologies.

Can Police Use Video Footage to Ticket or Arrest You?

With the rise of smartphones, dashcams, and doorbell cameras, public video footage has become a powerful tool in modern law enforcement. But can police actually issue tickets or make arrests based solely on video sent in by private citizens? Yes, they can — and they do, particularly in cities like Los Angeles.

Let’s explore how it works, what the law says, and what real cases tell us about the outcome of using video footage as legal evidence.

How Police Use Video as Legal Evidence

Video submitted by the public is increasingly being used by police departments for:

  • Traffic enforcement

  • Identifying suspects in crimes

  • Filing misdemeanor or felony charges

  • Public shaming that leads to voluntary surrenders

The footage must meet a few criteria:

  • It must clearly depict a violation or crime.

  • The individual(s) must be identifiable.

  • The footage must be timestamped and verifiable.

  • The incident must occur in a jurisdiction where video-based enforcement is allowed.

Key Stats on Video-Based Policing

  • A 2023 report from the International Association of Chiefs of Police (IACP) noted that over 50% of major U.S. departments accept and use citizen-submitted video footage in official investigations.

  • In a 2022 LAPD study, 1 in 8 arrests related to street takeovers in Los Angeles were made possible due to social media or smartphone videos submitted by the public.

  • In cities like Chicago, New York, and Los Angeles, doorbell cam footage led to arrests in over 30% of reported package thefts in high-density neighborhoods.

Real Examples: Video Leads to Arrests and Citations

1. Street Racing and Speeding in Los Angeles

Street takeovers and reckless speeding are major issues in LA. In one notable 2022 case, a citizen submitted dashcam footage of two Dodge Chargers weaving through traffic on the 101 Freeway at over 100 mph. The LAPD's Central Traffic Division was able to identify one vehicle via license plate and issued:

  • A $1,500 speeding citation

  • A misdemeanor reckless driving charge

  • A 30-day vehicle impound

LAPD’s street racing tip line receives hundreds of videos per month. Officers say many lead to mailed citations and court dates, especially when plates and timestamps are visible.

2. Road Rage Incident on the 405

A viral 2023 video showed a man smashing another driver’s windshield with a pipe during an altercation near Sherman Oaks. A bystander uploaded the video to Twitter, tagging the LAPD. Within 48 hours, the suspect was arrested and charged with:

  • Felony vandalism

  • Assault with a deadly weapon

The video served as primary evidence in court and led to a conviction with 9 months in county jail.

3. Reckless Motorcycle Group on the 110 Freeway

In early 2024, dozens of motorcyclists blocked traffic to perform stunts on the freeway. Multiple dashcams caught the group in action. CHP used the footage to:

  • Identify 6 riders

  • Issue 4 citations for reckless driving

  • Make 2 arrests (one rider had outstanding warrants)

Can You Get a Ticket Based Only on Citizen-Submitted Video?

Yes — if the video meets legal standards. In California, there’s no requirement that a police officer witness a violation in person if clear video evidence exists. However:

  • Officers must verify the vehicle’s registration and the driver’s identity.

  • You may receive a Notice to Appear in court rather than an immediate fine.

  • Video alone is not always sufficient for arrest — supporting witness statements or other corroborating evidence are often needed.

What About Privacy?

If the footage was captured:

  • In public: There is generally no expectation of privacy.

  • By private citizens: They are within their rights to film in public spaces.

  • Inside a home or private property: This could trigger legal concerns if obtained without consent or a warrant.

guide to submit video to police

🎥 Guide to Submitting Video Footage to LAPD or CHP

✅ What You Need Before You Submit:

  • Clear video footage (MP4 or MOV format preferred)

  • Visible license plate or vehicle details (make/model/color)

  • Exact time, date, and location of the incident

  • Your contact info (optional for anonymous reports)

📤 How to Submit to LAPD

Option 1: Street Racing & Reckless Driving Reports

  • Email: streetracing@lapd.online

  • Subject Line: Video Evidence – Street Racing – [Date of Incident]

  • Include in Email:

    pgsql
    FullName: [Your Nameor Anonymous] Date & Timeof Incident: [MM/DD/YYYY, HH:MM AM/PM] Location: [Street, Freeway, Cross Streets, City] Vehicle Details: [License plate, color, make, model if known] Description: [Brief summaryof what happened] Video Attached: [Yes/No — attach video or link to file]
    • Attach video file (under 25MB) or upload to a cloud service (Google Drive, Dropbox, etc.) and provide the link.

Option 2: General Crime or Traffic Violation

🚓 How to Submit to California Highway Patrol (CHP)

For freeway incidents, reckless driving, or hit-and-runs:

Sample Email Template:

pgsql
Subject: Video Evidence – Reckless Driving on [Freeway Name] – [Date] Dear CHP Officer, I am submitting video evidence of a reckless driving incident that occurred on [Freeway Name] on [MM/DD/YYYY] at approximately [Time]. Location: [Mile marker, nearest exit, orcross streets] Vehicle Details: [License plate, color, make/model if visible] Brief Description: [1–2 sentences about what happened] I’ve attached the video to this message (or linked to a cloud file below): [Dropbox/Google Drive Link] Please let me know ifany further details are needed. Sincerely, [Your Nameor "Concerned Citizen"]

⚠️ Tips for Effective Submissions

  • Use stable, non-shaky footage.

  • Avoid narration or added commentary.

  • Do not edit or add filters to the video.

  • Keep a copy for your own records.

Download This Guide as a PDF:
(Let me know if you’d like me to generate a downloadable PDF for printing or sharing.)

Would you like the guide branded with your site name or logo (e.g., for use on diyicebaths.com or another domain)?

Your Legal Rights

If you're the person being investigated based on video:

  • You can challenge the evidence in court.

  • You have the right to see the footage used against you.

  • You are presumed innocent until proven guilty.

  • You do not have to speak to police without legal counsel.

Final Thoughts

In cities like Los Angeles, where reckless driving and street takeovers are a growing issue, police are actively encouraging the public to report crimes using video evidence. While the law protects your rights, the rise of camera-enabled enforcement means your actions — on or off the freeway — may come back to you later.

Whether you're a concerned citizen or just want to understand your legal standing, it's important to know: Yes, video footage can absolutely lead to tickets and arrests — and it already is.

What Happens if You Crash with a Waymo Driverless Car

The Rise of Driverless Cars and Waymo

Manhattan Beach Pedestrian Deaths and DUI Crashes on PCH / Sepulveda Boulevard

Manhattan Beach, CA – The stretch of Sepulveda Boulevard (Pacific Coast Highway/PCH) between Artesia Boulevard and 9th Street has become one of the most dangerous roadways in the South Bay for pedestrians and drivers. Over the past six months, this corridor has seen multiple fatal crashes, including three pedestrian deaths and a suspected DUI collision, raising urgent concerns among residents and safety advocates.

⚠️ May 3, 2025 – Fatal Suspected DUI Crash on Sepulveda Blvd

At approximately 12:45 a.m. on Sunday, May 3, a pedestrian was fatally struck in the area of Sepulveda Boulevard and Duncan Place. According to the Manhattan Beach Police Department (MBPD):

  • Officers found the victim lying on the roadway next to the suspect’s vehicle.

  • The driver remained on scene and was suspected of being under the influence.

  • The pedestrian was pronounced dead at the scene.

This incident is being investigated as a DUI-related fatality.

🟥 April 19, 2025 – Fatal Hit-and-Run on PCH at Ocean Avenue in Torrance

Just two weeks prior, on April 19, a separate fatal hit-and-run occurred on Pacific Coast Highway at Ocean Avenue in Torrance, resulting in the death of a pedestrian.

According to the Torrance Police Department:

  • Officers responded to reports of a person down in the roadway.

  • The victim was pronounced deceased at the scene.

  • The suspect vehicle fled and has not yet been located.

The incident remains under investigation, and authorities urge any witnesses to come forward.

This highlights a growing regional problem across South Bay cities, with dangerous driving behaviors contributing to pedestrian fatalities on major corridors like PCH.

💥 Other Major Pedestrian Fatalities on Sepulveda Blvd

December 16, 2024 – Pedestrian Killed Near 9th Street

A 72-year-old man, Michael Kawasaki, was struck and killed in the 900 block of Sepulveda Blvd. The driver stayed on scene and cooperated with police.

January 7, 2025 – Fatal Hit-and-Run Near Longfellow Drive

In a hit-and-run crash on the 300 block of Sepulveda Blvd, one person was killed and another critically injured. The suspect was later apprehended.

📉 Why Sepulveda Boulevard Is So Dangerous

1. Hilly Terrain with Limited Visibility

Sepulveda Blvd features steep hills, with intersections like 9th Street and Duncan Place located at hill crests or bases, which significantly limits driver line of sight. Drivers may not see pedestrians or vehicles until it’s too late.

2. Poor Lighting and Infrastructure

Lack of pedestrian lighting, unmarked crosswalks, and minimal safety buffers increases the risk of night-time accidents.

3. High Speeds and Traffic Volume

Though the posted limit is 40–45 mph, many drivers exceed this, especially at night. Coupled with limited visibility, this creates extremely hazardous conditions.

4. Multiple Business Entrances

The corridor is lined with businesses and driveways, causing sudden stops and turns that add to collision risk.

🚔 City Response: Plans to Improve PCH Safety

The City of Manhattan Beach is reviewing multiple safety upgrades, including:

  • Flashing pedestrian crosswalks

  • Improved street lighting

  • Speed feedback signs

  • Raised medians for pedestrian refuge

  • DUI checkpoints and increased patrols

📝 Summary: Recent Fatal Incidents (Nov 2024 – May 2025)

Date Location Type Outcome
May 3, 2025 Sepulveda & Duncan Place (MB) Suspected DUI 1 pedestrian fatality
Apr 19, 2025 PCH & Ocean Ave (Torrance) Hit-and-run 1 pedestrian fatality
Jan 7, 2025 Sepulveda & Longfellow (MB) Hit-and-run 1 fatality, 1 critical injury
Dec 16, 2024 Sepulveda & 9th Street (MB) Pedestrian struck 1 fatality

🚶 Safety Tips for South Bay Drivers and Pedestrians

Pedestrians:

  • Cross only at signalized or marked crosswalks

  • Wear reflective gear at night

  • Avoid distractions like smartphones and headphones

Drivers:

  • Obey posted speed limits

  • Be vigilant in low-visibility zones

  • Never drive under the influence

  • Yield to pedestrians at crosswalks and driveways

  • Don't drive in the far right lane

  • Don't park on PCH

⚠️ Final Thoughts

With multiple pedestrian deaths across Manhattan Beach and Torrance in just a few months, Sepulveda Boulevard and PCH are proving increasingly deadly. Local governments, police departments, and residents must act now to enhance safety and hold reckless drivers accountable before more lives are lost.

Manhattan Beach Pedestrian Deaths